Date: Tue, 10 Jan 1995 08:32:09 -0800 (PST) From: Nathan Newman Subject: THE NATION: Drop the Prop (187 that is) To: Nathan Newman (Hi all, this article talks about the Dec 10th protests and the electronic organizing from the 187resist list --Nathan) --------------------------------------------------- From THE NATION, January 9/16, 1995 "Drop the Prop" by Rose George "One, two, three, four! We don't want your racist law!" Even before they start chanting, the college students who marched against Proposition 187 on December 10 seem to have gotten their wish, as the California initiative lies blocked in a federal court. But the anti-immigrant message underpinning 187--and the recent mass high school walkouts in California--still inspired more than 3,000 students to put down their term papers and take to the streets to mark the first National Day of Action for a nascent student movement. Rallies in San Francisco, Philadelphia, and Amherst, among other places, rounded off a week of teach-ins and vigils, sit-ins and protests at more than twenty campuses across the country. In four frantic weeks at the end of the term, student organizations managed to mobilize an impressive array of people around an issue that, when not dismissed as merely "Latino," is seen as California's problem. To be sure, the Mexican flags were flying in solidarity with the "victims of 187," but the louder message of the marchers was the one that got the feet on the street: Bigotry has no borders. "This is one of the most multicultural gathers of student activists that I've ever seen," said Swarthmore College professor Meta Mendel-Reyes as she surveyed the packed Free Quaker Meeting House in Philadelphia, where 500 students from eight colleges had gathered to protest 187's racist scapegoating. Day-Glo antennae, mocking the demeaning term "alien" waved from brown, black, white, Republican, Democrat and anarchist heads. Statements read out from students organizing in Madison, Boulder, Ann Arbor, Austin and Chicago were signed by groups as diverse as the Palestine Solidarity Committee, the Bryn Mawr Republicans and the Grassroots Queers. Clearly, the discriminatory ethos of 187 (embodied most recently in the Republican's proposed welfare reform bill) hit a raw nerve among more that the "immigrant" solidarity groups. "One eighty-seven is an issue that transcends racial and ethnic distinctions," said University of Texas student Sheila Contreras, "and a LOT of people are angry." Channeling this fury into coordinated action has been possible in large part because of the information superhighway. Diverse though they may be, these students have a couple of things in common: access to free e-mail and enough Internet savvy to know how to use it. When Nathan Newman of U.C. Berkeley's Center for Community Economic Research set up the "187resist" list (an electronic discussion group using e-mail), he was astounded at the response. Set up on November 20 with the Bay Area's Movimiento por los Derechos de los Immigrantes, "187resist" had 500 subscribers within six days. Accordin to Newman, who is involved in a project to get Bay Area community groups and labor unions on-line, this was an unprecedented rate of response for a progressive list. Equally astounding was the way the list served as a primary mobilizing tool. "E-mail lists have definitely assisted organizations in the past by spreading info," said Newman. "but this was the first time I ever personally saw organizing happening in real time as organizations formed in response to electronic messages." On-line discussions mirroring the passion of dorm-room debates breathed life into dormant campus coalitions. Organizing tips ("if 187 is not an issue on your campus, make it one!") came in info packets circulated by more established groups, such as Swarthmore's Coalition Against Xenophobia, Princeton's CAP-187 and the 187 veterans in California. Nor are the halls of academia untouched by the students' energy. Petitions and resolutions are currently circulating on the Internet, including an appeal to four academic professional associations to boycott California's conference facilities. So far it has collected 300 electronic signatures (to join the discussion, write to listserv@cmsa.berkeley.edu with the following message: Subscribe 187-L your name). Veterans of the huge Gulf War protests, the last large-scale student mobilization, may sniff at the low numbers. But it's early yet, and the ball is rolling. Other boycotts are up for discussion; teach-ins and rallies are planned for next year. If student activists continue to ally disgust for an increasingly vicious political culture with an effective use of cyberspace's immediacy; they could lead organizing into the next century.